Review an EdTech or AI vendor's privacy policy for meaningful student-data risks and get a practical suggested use scope. Routine questions stay in the report without automatically holding up student use.
FERPACOPPACalifornia SOPIPAEd. Code § 49073.1CDE AI GuidanceAI Model TrainingSB 243 Flagging
Built to answer the practical question: who can reasonably use this? Routine contract, analytics, permission, or documentation questions are listed for follow-up without automatically turning the overall result yellow.
How to use this tool
1
Open the policy
Paste a privacy-policy link and open it in a new tab, or skip ahead if you already have the text.
2
Copy & paste
Copy the full policy from the vendor site and paste it into EdTech Trust Check.
3
Review the screening
TeacherHive AI evaluates 14 areas and identifies special-review flags.
4
Follow up
Use the generated vendor questions, DPA review, and district approval process before use.
EdTech Trust Check
Privacy, AI & Student Data Review · TeacherHive
Analyze a privacy policy
Have only a link? Open it from here, copy the policy text, then paste it below for a transparent first-pass review.
1
Have a privacy policy link?
Paste the URL and open the vendor's policy in a new tab. If you already have the policy text, skip this step.
Then: on the vendor page, select the policy text and copy it. Return here and paste it into Step 2. Keyboard shortcut: Ctrl+A, Ctrl+C on Windows/ChromeOS or ⌘A, ⌘C on Mac.
For transparency, the AI reviews the text you paste below. It does not browse or analyze the URL by itself.
2
Paste the privacy policy text
Paste as much of the complete policy as possible. Terms of Service can be reviewed separately when they contain privacy or AI provisions.
Tip: paste the full policy whenever possible. Long policies are reviewed in smaller sections and combined into one report.0 chars
Paste at least 300 characters of policy text in Step 2 to enable analysis.
✓
Recommended use:
Summary rationale
Teacher-friendly summary
14-area practical screening
Special review flags
Questions to ask the vendor
This AI-assisted screening is based solely on the supplied text and is not legal advice or formal district approval. Routine yellow review notes can appear below while the overall recommendation remains green. Normal district review still applies.
Framework used by this version
The analysis is designed to distinguish true blocking concerns from routine contract, DPA, configuration, and vendor follow-up. It is informed by:
FERPA and applicable school-official / education-record considerations.
The Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), including the FTC's 2025 final rule amendments.
California Student Online Personal Information Protection Act (SOPIPA), Business and Professions Code § 22584.
California Education Code § 49073.1 contractual student-record protections.
California Department of Education 2025 AI Guidance and 2026 Model Policy: Artificial Intelligence in Education. CDE describes the model policy as exemplary and nonmandatory.
California SB 243 companion-chatbot requirements when the supplied policy suggests the product may fall within that category.
Always confirm current law and district counsel guidance when a vendor presents a significant or unusual risk.